In an attempt to be politically correct and appease his liberal base, Obama has now rejected the term "Radical Islam" as being the cause of worldwide terrorism.
A national security document created during the Bush Administration read "The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century." Now, Obama is changing the national security document which is the premier document that determines U.S. national security strategy.
Who knows what will Obama put in place of radical Islam?
I know. Global warming. Or rather, the lack of nationalized health care. How about a bunch of Eskimos in Northern Alaska? Did you see the igloos that brought down the Towers on 9/11?
Unfortunately, Obama continues his famous doublespeak. On the one hand, he talks up a big deal that nuke terrorism is the number one threat facing the nation and how he remains committed to the security of the U.S.
But, when it comes to actually take a stand against terrorism in action rather than rhetoric, Obama fails miserably and hides behind his politically correct appeasing advisers in the White House.
If Obama can not even properly identify the very enemy that threatens the U.S. which is radical Islam, what makes anyone seriously think that Obama will have the courage to confront Iran or launch a military strike if the U.S. is attacked again Gdforbid.
How can anyone seriously believe that Obama is protecting the U.S. from daily threats against the country when he strikes a deal with the Russians to reduce the United States' nuclear arms supply in a time when Iran or North Korea or a terrorist group could launch a bio terror attack on the U.S.? (Obama heads to Prague to sign the U.S.-Russian Treaty which will reduce nuclear warheads to 1,550 over 7 years)
If someone out there has confidence in Obama's national security credentials, please tell me where you derive such a level of confidence in a President who is working actively to appease the enemy rather than weaken them.